↓ Skip to main content

Mesenchymal stem cell transformation and sarcoma genesis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Sarcoma Research, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 106)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mesenchymal stem cell transformation and sarcoma genesis
Published in
Clinical Sarcoma Research, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-3329-3-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Xiao, Alexander B Mohseny, Pancras C W Hogendoorn, Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen

Abstract

MSCs are hypothesized to potentially give rise to sarcomas after transformation and therefore serve as a good model to study sarcomagenesis. Both spontaneous and induced transformation of MSCs have been reported, however, spontaneous transformation has only been convincingly shown in mouse MSCs while induced transformation has been demonstrated in both mouse and human MSCs. Transformed MSCs of both species can give rise to pleomorphic sarcomas after transplantation into mice, indicating the potential MSC origin of so-called non-translocation induced sarcomas. Comparison of expression profiles and differentiation capacities between MSCs and sarcoma cells further supports this. Deregulation of P53- Retinoblastoma-, PI3K-AKT-and MAPK pathways has been implicated in transformation of MSCs. MSCs have also been indicated as cell of origin in several types of chromosomal translocation associated sarcomas. In mouse models the generated sarcoma type depends on amongst others the tissue origin of the MSCs, the targeted pathways and genes and the differentiation commitment status of MSCs. While some insights are glowing, it is clear that more studies are needed to thoroughly understand the molecular mechanism of sarcomagenesis from MSCs and mechanisms determining the sarcoma type, which will potentially give directions for targeted therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 99 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,268,651
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#20
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,348
of 209,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.