You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determining who responds better to a computer- vs. human-delivered physical activity intervention: results from the community health advice by telephone (CHAT) trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-109 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric B Hekler, Matthew P Buman, Jennifer Otten, Cynthia M Castro, Lauren Grieco, Bess Marcus, Robert H Friedman, Melissa A Napolitano, Abby C King |
| Abstract |
Little research has explored who responds better to an automated vs. human advisor for health behaviors in general, and for physical activity (PA) promotion in particular. The purpose of this study was to explore baseline factors (i.e., demographics, motivation, interpersonal style, and external resources) that moderate intervention efficacy delivered by either a human or automated advisor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Psychology | 14 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,600,874
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,799
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,789
of 214,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.