↓ Skip to main content

Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
31 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
344 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
335 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pleural ultrasonography versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: review of the literature and meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc13016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saadah Alrajab, Asser M Youssef, Nuri I Akkus, Gloria Caldito

Abstract

Ultrasonography is being increasingly utilized in acute care settings with expanding applications. Pneumothorax evaluation by ultrasonography is a fast, safe, easy and inexpensive alternative to chest radiographs. In this review, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the current literature comparing ultrasonography and chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 328 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 14%
Other 40 12%
Student > Postgraduate 35 10%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 85 25%
Unknown 70 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 218 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 83 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,183,002
of 25,844,183 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#959
of 6,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,205
of 215,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,844,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.