↓ Skip to main content

The impact of academic calendar cycle on coronary artery bypass outcomes: a comparison of teaching and non-teaching hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of academic calendar cycle on coronary artery bypass outcomes: a comparison of teaching and non-teaching hospitals
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1749-8090-8-191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raja R Gopaldas, Douglas M Overbey, Tam K Dao, John G Markley

Abstract

The commencement of new academic cycle in July is presumed to be associated with poor patient outcomes, although supportive evidence is limited for cardiac surgery patients. We sought to determine if the new academic cycle affected the outcomes of patients undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 5 26%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,317,637
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#223
of 1,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,810
of 203,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.