↓ Skip to main content

Ford and Edison in a modern regulatory environment: the first-in-human trial of night-work and artificial light

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ford and Edison in a modern regulatory environment: the first-in-human trial of night-work and artificial light
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12995-017-0154-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas C. Erren, David M. Shaw, Ursula Wild, J. Valérie Groß

Abstract

A thought experiment places Henry Ford and Thomas Alva Edison in a modern regulatory environment. In a utopian occupational world devoid of night-shifts or artificial light, Ford wants to experiment with "working through the night". To support Ford's project, Edison offers his patented electric lamps to "turn nights into days". An ethics committee [EC] does not approve the night-work experiment and Utopia's Food and Drug Administration [FDA] does not approve the potential medical device as safe for use by humans. According to the EC and FDA, complex effects on circadian biology and thus safety of work and light at night are not understood. The thought experiment conveys that we should pay more attention to possible risks of work and light at chronobiologically unusual times.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 32%
Professor 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 21%
Engineering 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,935,763
of 24,626,543 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#102
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,077
of 312,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,626,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.