↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of suspected malignant hyperthermia events during anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of suspected malignant hyperthermia events during anesthesia
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2253-13-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Schuster, Stephan Johannsen, Daniel Schneiderbanger, Norbert Roewer

Abstract

Malignant hyperthermia (MH), a metabolic myopathy triggered by volatile anesthetics and depolarizing muscle relaxants, is a potentially lethal complication of general anesthesia in susceptible patients. The implementation of modern inhalation anesthetics that research indicates as less potent trigger substances and the recommended limitations of succinylcholine use, suggests there may be considerable decline of fulminant MH cases. In the presented study, the authors analyzed suspected MH episodes during general anesthesia of patients that were referred to the Wuerzburg MH unit between 2007 and 2011, assuming that MH is still a relevant anesthetic problem in our days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 26%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 9 29%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,025,075
of 23,878,777 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#570
of 1,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,459
of 206,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,878,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,593 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.