You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A test of agent-based models as a tool for predicting patterns of pathogen transmission in complex landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6785-13-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly E Lane-deGraaf, Ryan C Kennedy, SM Niaz Arifin, Gregory R Madey, Agustin Fuentes, Hope Hollocher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
| Researcher | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,102,263
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,698
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,748
of 215,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#54
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.