↓ Skip to main content

Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds

Overview of attention for article published in Porcine Health Management, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds
Published in
Porcine Health Management, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40813-016-0049-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuzo Koketsu, Satomi Tani, Ryosuke Iida

Abstract

We review critical factors associated with reproductive performance of female breeding pigs, their lifetime performance and herd productivity in commercial herds. The factors include both sow-level and herd-level factors. High risk sow-level groups for decreasing reproductive performance of female pigs are low or high parity, increased outdoor temperature, decreased lactation feed intake, single inseminations, increased lactation length, prolonged weaning-to-first-mating interval, low birth weight or low preweaning growth rate, a few pigs born alive at parity 1, an increased number of stillborn piglets, foster-in or nurse sow practices and low or high age at first-mating. Also, returned female pigs are at risk having a recurrence of returning to estrus, and female pigs around farrowing are more at risk of dying. Herd-level risk groups include female pigs being fed in low efficiency breeding herds, late insemination timing, high within-herd variability in pig flow, limited numbers of farrowing spaces and fluctuating age structure. To maximize the reproductive potential of female pigs, producers are recommended to closely monitor females in these high-risk groups and improve herd management. Additionally, herd management and performance measurements in high-performing herds should be targeted.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 292 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 15%
Student > Master 37 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Researcher 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 106 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 51 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 115 39%