↓ Skip to main content

Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011
Published in
Reproductive Health, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12978-016-0254-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janete Teixeira Duarte, Antonio Eugenio C. C. de Almeida, Shirley de Mello Pereira Abrantes

Abstract

The increased incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Brazil represents a significant public health issue. This issue has raised awareness among health authorities regarding the quality of condoms. In Brazil, male condoms need to be certified. The certification process evaluates in detail the manufacturing and quality of the final product; however, post-market surveillance is not part of the normal certification practice. From 2009 to 2011, we evaluated 20 male condoms brands per lot of 8 manufactures-both domestic and imported-marketed in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Sampling was performed per ISO 2859-1, and the condoms were evaluated on length, width, thickness, holes, integrity of primary packaging, bursting volume, bursting pressure, label and secondary packaging, following the criteria established in the Brazilian National Health Oversight Agency Resolution no. RDC 62/2008. Of the 20 evaluated brands, 17 brands were found to be noncompliant with the guidelines of the Brazilian National Health Oversight Agency Resolution no. RDC 62/2008 in at least one of the analyses performed. Any nonconforming unit has serious public health implications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 35%