↓ Skip to main content

Correlated duplications and losses in the evolution of palmitoylation writer and eraser families

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlated duplications and losses in the evolution of palmitoylation writer and eraser families
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12862-017-0932-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stijn Wittouck, Vera van Noort

Abstract

Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) change protein properties. Each PTM type is associated with domain families that apply the modification (writers), remove the modification (erasers) and bind to the modified sites (readers) together called toolkit domains. The evolutionary origin and diversification remains largely understudied, except for tyrosine phosphorylation. Protein palmitoylation entails the addition of a palmitoyl fatty acid to a cysteine residue. This PTM functions as a membrane anchor and is involved in a range of cellular processes. One writer family and two erasers families are known for protein palmitoylation. In this work we unravel the evolutionary history of these writer and eraser families. We constructed a high-quality profile hidden Markov model (HMM) of each family, searched for protein family members in fully sequenced genomes and subsequently constructed phylogenetic distributions of the families. We constructed Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic trees and using gene tree rearrangement and tree reconciliation inferred their evolutionary histories in terms of duplication and loss events. We identified lineages where the families expanded or contracted and found that the evolutionary histories of the families are correlated. The results show that the erasers were invented first, before the origin of the eukaryotes. The writers first arose in the eukaryotic ancestor. The writers and erasers show co-expansions in several eukaryotic ancestral lineages. These expansions often seem to be followed by contractions in some or all of the lineages further in evolution. A general pattern of correlated evolution appears between writer and eraser domains. These co-evolution patterns could be used in new methods for interaction prediction based on phylogenies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 36%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Master 4 16%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 24%
Neuroscience 4 16%
Chemistry 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,173,117
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,554
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,901
of 323,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#63
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.