You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome sequencing reveals fine scale diversification and reticulation history during speciation in Sus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent AF Frantz, Joshua G Schraiber, Ole Madsen, Hendrik-Jan Megens, Mirte Bosse, Yogesh Paudel, Gono Semiadi, Erik Meijaard, Ning Li, Richard PMA Crooijmans, Alan L Archibald, Montgomery Slatkin, Lawrence B Schook, Greger Larson, Martien AM Groenen |
| Abstract |
Elucidating the process of speciation requires an in-depth understanding of the evolutionary history of the species in question. Studies that rely upon a limited number of genetic loci do not always reveal actual evolutionary history, and often confuse inferences related to phylogeny and speciation. Whole-genome data, however, can overcome this issue by providing a nearly unbiased window into the patterns and processes of speciation. In order to reveal the complexity of the speciation process, we sequenced and analyzed the genomes of 10 wild pigs, representing morphologically or geographically well-defined species and subspecies of the genus Sus from insular and mainland Southeast Asia, and one African common warthog. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,141,700
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,598
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,052
of 215,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.