↓ Skip to main content

Sustained impact of community-based physical activity interventions: key elements for success

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sustained impact of community-based physical activity interventions: key elements for success
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-892
Pubmed ID
Authors

Callista Haggis, Joanie Sims-Gould, Meghan Winters, Kaitlyn Gutteridge, Heather A McKay

Abstract

Compelling evidence supports the cost effectiveness and potential impact of physical activity on chronic disease prevention and health promotion. Quality of evidence is one piece, but certainly not the sole determinant of whether public health interventions, physical activity focused or otherwise, achieve their full potential for impact. Health promotion at both population and community levels must progress beyond health intervention models that isolate individuals from social, environmental, and political systems of influence.We offer a critical evaluation of lessons learned from two successful research initiatives to provide insights as to how health promotion research contributes to sustained impact. We highlight factors key to success including the theoretical and methodological integration of: i) a social ecological approach; ii) participatory action research (PAR) methods; and iii) an interdisciplinary team.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 17%
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 29 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 19%
Social Sciences 33 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Sports and Recreations 18 9%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 42 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#1,816,354
of 21,467,894 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,016
of 13,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,757
of 184,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,467,894 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.