↓ Skip to main content

Validation of a transcutaneous bilirubin meter in Mongolian neonates: comparison with total serum bilirubin

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of a transcutaneous bilirubin meter in Mongolian neonates: comparison with total serum bilirubin
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-13-151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moe Akahira-Azuma, Naohiro Yonemoto, Battsengel Ganzorig, Rintaro Mori, Shinichi Hosokawa, Takeji Matsushita, Bayasgalantai Bavuusuren, Enkhtur Shonkhuuz

Abstract

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, especially kernicterus, can be prevented by screening for neonatal jaundice. The transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) meter is a non-invasive medical device for screening neonates. The study aimed to investigate the validity of a TcB meter in a resource-limited setting such as Mongolia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 19%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,850,615
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,046
of 2,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,878
of 204,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.