↓ Skip to main content

Objectively determined physical activity levels of primary school children in south-west Germany

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Objectively determined physical activity levels of primary school children in south-west Germany
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-895
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Kettner, Susanne Kobel, Nanette Fischbach, Clemens Drenowatz, Jens Dreyhaupt, Tamara Wirt, Benjamin Koch, Jürgen Michael Steinacker

Abstract

Only a small proportion of children and adolescents meet current recommendations of at least 60 min of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) daily. Most of the available data, however, relies on subjective reports; there is limited objective data on physical activity (PA) levels in German primary school children. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to accurately determine how much time children spend undertaking different intensities of PA and being sedentary during weekdays and weekend using objective assessment tools. Gender-specific and age-related differences were examined along with differences between normal weight and overweight/obese children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 20%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 33 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,956,912
of 23,940,793 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,401
of 15,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,584
of 208,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#76
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.