You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study protocol of the Diabetes and Depression Study (DAD): a multi-center randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of a diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral group therapy versus sertraline in patients with major depression and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-206 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frank Petrak, Stephan Herpertz, Christian Albus, Norbert Hermanns, Christoph Hiemke, Wolfgang Hiller, Kai Kronfeld, Johannes Kruse, Bernd Kulzer, Christian Ruckes, Matthias J Müller |
| Abstract |
Depression is common in diabetes and associated with hyperglycemia, diabetes related complications and mortality. No single intervention has been identified that consistently leads to simultaneous improvement of depression and glycemic control. Our aim is to analyze the efficacy of a diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBT) compared to sertraline (SER) in adults with depression and poorly controlled diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 284 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 15% |
| Researcher | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 19% |
| Unknown | 74 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 72 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 80 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,115,582
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,999
of 4,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,463
of 197,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#29
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.