↓ Skip to main content

Dosimetric benefit to organs at risk following margin reductions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Communications, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dosimetric benefit to organs at risk following margin reductions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity‐modulated radiation therapy
Published in
Cancer Communications, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40880-015-0016-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan-Ping Mao, Wen-Jing Yin, Rui Guo, Guang-Shun Zhang, Jian-Lan Fang, Feng Chi, Zhen-Yu Qi, Meng-Zhong Liu, Jun Ma, Ying Sun

Abstract

It is important to decrease the radiation exposure of normal tissue in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Minimizing planning target volume (PTV) margins with more precise target localization techniques can achieve this goal. This study aimed to quantify the extent to which organs at risk (OARs) are spared when using reduced margins in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Two IMRT plans were regenerated for 40 patients with NPC based on two PTV margins, which were reduced or unchanged following cone beam computed tomography online correction. The reduced-margin plan was optimized based on maximal dose reduction to OARs without compromising target coverage. Dosimetric comparisons were evaluated in terms of target coverage and OAR sparing. Improvements in target coverage occurred with margin reduction, and significant improvements in dosimetric parameters were observed for all OARs (P < 0.05) except for the right optic nerve, chiasm, and lens. Doses to OARs decreased at a rate of 1.5% to 7.7%. Sparing of the left parotid and right parotid, where the mean dose (Dmean) decreased at a rate of 7.1% and 7.7%, respectively, was greater than the sparing of other OARs. Significant improvements in OAR sparing were observed with margin reduction, in addition to improvement in target coverage. The parotids benefited most from the online imaging-guided approach.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 41%
Student > Master 3 14%
Lecturer 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 18%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%