Title |
A simple consensus approach improves somatic mutation prediction accuracy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Medicine, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/gm494 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David L Goode, Sally M Hunter, Maria A Doyle, Tao Ma, Simone M Rowley, David Choong, Georgina L Ryland, Ian G Campbell |
Abstract |
Differentiating true somatic mutations from artifacts in massively parallel sequencing data is an immense challenge. To develop methods for optimal somatic mutation detection and to identify factors influencing somatic mutation prediction accuracy, we validated predictions from three somatic mutation detection algorithms, MuTect, JointSNVMix2 and SomaticSniper, by Sanger sequencing. Full consensus predictions had a validation rate of >98%, but some partial consensus predictions validated too. In cases of partial consensus, read depth and mapping quality data, along with additional prediction methods, aided in removing inaccurate predictions. Our consensus approach is fast, flexible and provides a high-confidence list of putative somatic mutations. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 59 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 40% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 31% |
Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |