You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Measurement equivalence and feasibility of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: paper-and-pencil versus touch-screen administration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-12-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu-Jun Chang, Chih-Hung Chang, Chiao-Ling Peng, Hsi-Chin Wu, Hsueh-Chun Lin, Jong-Yi Wang, Tsai-Chung Li, Yi-Chun Yeh, Wen-Miin Liang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |