You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
TEACCH-based group social skills training for children with high-functioning autism: a pilot randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1751-0759-7-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kayoko Ichikawa, Yoshimitsu Takahashi, Masahiko Ando, Tokie Anme, Tatsuro Ishizaki, Hinako Yamaguchi, Takeo Nakayama |
| Abstract |
Although social skills training programs for people with high-functioning autism (HFA) are widely practiced, the standardization of curricula, the examination of clinical effectiveness, and the evaluation of the feasibility of future trials have yet to be done in Asian countries. To compensate for this problem, a Japanese pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Treatment and Education of Autistic and Related Communication Handicapped Children (TEACCH)-based group social skills training for children with HFA and their mothers was conducted. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 254 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 65 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 82 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 72 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,817,235
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#135
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,331
of 220,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them