↓ Skip to main content

The importance of social support in the associations between psychological distress and somatic health problems and socio-economic factors among older adults living at home: a cross sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of social support in the associations between psychological distress and somatic health problems and socio-economic factors among older adults living at home: a cross sectional study
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-12-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hege Bøen, Odd Steffen Dalgard, Espen Bjertness

Abstract

Little is known of the importance of social support in the associations between psychological distress and somatic health problems and socio-economic factors among older adults living at home. The objectives of the present study were to investigate the associations of social support, somatic health problems and socio-economic factors with psychological distress. We also examined changes in the association of somatic health problems and socio-economic factors with psychological distress after adjusting for social support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 265 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Student > Master 34 13%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 89 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 19%
Psychology 40 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 9%
Social Sciences 24 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 100 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,812,500
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#733
of 3,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,698
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.