↓ Skip to main content

The PRIME trial protocol: evaluating the impact of an intervention implemented in public health centres on management of malaria and health outcomes of children using a cluster-randomised design in…

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The PRIME trial protocol: evaluating the impact of an intervention implemented in public health centres on management of malaria and health outcomes of children using a cluster-randomised design in Tororo, Uganda
Published in
Implementation Science, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah G Staedke, Clare IR Chandler, Deborah DiLiberto, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Florence Nankya, Emily Webb, Grant Dorsey, Moses R Kamya

Abstract

In Africa, inadequate health services contribute to the lack of progress on malaria control. Evidence of the impact of interventions to improve health services on population-level malaria indicators is needed. We are conducting a cluster-randomised trial to assess whether a complex intervention delivered at public health centres in Uganda improves health outcomes of children and treatment of malaria, as compared to the current standard of care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 21%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 28 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,178,787
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,485
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,543
of 205,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#36
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.