↓ Skip to main content

The PRIME trial protocol: evaluating the impact of an intervention implemented in public health centres on management of malaria and health outcomes of children using a cluster-randomised design in…

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The PRIME trial protocol: evaluating the impact of an intervention implemented in public health centres on management of malaria and health outcomes of children using a cluster-randomised design in Tororo, Uganda
Published in
Implementation Science, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah G Staedke, Clare IR Chandler, Deborah DiLiberto, Catherine Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Florence Nankya, Emily Webb, Grant Dorsey, Moses R Kamya

Abstract

In Africa, inadequate health services contribute to the lack of progress on malaria control. Evidence of the impact of interventions to improve health services on population-level malaria indicators is needed. We are conducting a cluster-randomised trial to assess whether a complex intervention delivered at public health centres in Uganda improves health outcomes of children and treatment of malaria, as compared to the current standard of care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 25 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2013.
All research outputs
#13,336,612
of 21,347,834 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,462
of 1,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,207
of 187,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.