↓ Skip to main content

SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 15: Engaging the public in evidence-informed policymaking
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2009
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-7-s1-s15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D Oxman, Simon Lewin, John N Lavis, Atle Fretheim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 239 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 19%
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 15%
Other 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 55 21%
Unknown 34 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 34%
Social Sciences 43 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Psychology 10 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 49 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,152,500
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#297
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,561
of 164,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.