↓ Skip to main content

Reasons for discontinuation of subcutaneous interferon β-1a three times a week among patients with multiple sclerosis: a real-world cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reasons for discontinuation of subcutaneous interferon β-1a three times a week among patients with multiple sclerosis: a real-world cohort study
Published in
BMC Neurology, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12883-017-0831-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meritxell Sabidó-Espin, Rick Munschauer

Abstract

Continuation of interferon (IFN) β-based therapies is important for maximum treatment effectiveness in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS); however, few real-world data are available on discontinuation from IFN β. The aim of this cohort analysis was to estimate real-world discontinuation rates up to 3 years among MS patients in the United States taking subcutaneous (sc) IFN β-1a three times a week (tiw) and to identify whether the factors associated with discontinuation change over time. Patient data were pooled from the MarketScan(©) Commercial and Medicare Supplemental healthcare claims databases. Patients with ≥1 multiple sclerosis diagnosis who were sc IFN β-1a tiw naïve, had ≥1 year of continuous eligibility before treatment, and ≥1 prescription were followed from first prescription (index date) until date of discontinuation, switch, or end of observation. Treatment status was analysed at exactly 1, 2 or 3 years after index. Multivariable models were used to identify drivers of discontinuation. Data from 5956 patients were included; 2862 patients (48.1%) discontinued therapy. Discontinuation rates were 36.9% (1 year), 49.5% (2 years) and 55.8% (3 years). A greater proportion of discontinuing patients had poor adherence (<80% [94.0%] versus ≥80% [51.7%]) or were taking additional medication at follow-up versus the overall population. Factors independently associated with discontinuation irrespective of time on therapy were increasing number of magnetic resonance imaging scans (1 year adjusted odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.26-1.67; 2 years 1.18, 1.06-1.32; 3 years 1.20, 1.07-1.34) and adherence <80% versus ≥80% (1 year 180.95, 135.84-241.03; 2 years 135.80, 100.10-184.23; 3 years 174.89, 115.27-265.38). Factors associated only with early discontinuation (at 1 year) were ≥3 sets of laboratory investigations versus none (2.54, 1.20-5.38), and anxiolytic use at follow-up (1.40, 1.06-1.82). Factors associated only with later discontinuation (at 2 years and/or at 3 years) were antidepressant use at follow-up (2 years 1.46, 1.10-1.94) and greater number of relapses (2 years 1.60, 1.11-2.30; 3 years 2.31, 1.27-4.22). Potential drivers of discontinuation change over time. Improved awareness of the drivers of discontinuation could lead to targeted interventions to improve adherence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,208,018
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#855
of 2,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,921
of 314,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.