Title |
Drug-induced liver injury from antituberculous treatment: a retrospective study from a large TB centre in the UK
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-017-2330-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Aula Abbara, Sarah Chitty, Jennifer K. Roe, Rohma Ghani, Simon M. Collin, Andrew Ritchie, Onn Min Kon, John Dzvova, Harriet Davidson, Thomas E. Edwards, Charlotte Hateley, Matthew Routledge, Jim Buckley, Robert N. Davidson, Laurence John |
Abstract |
We describe drug-induced liver injury (DILI) secondary to antituberculous treatment (ATT) in a large tuberculosis (TB) centre in London; we identify the proportion who had risk factors for DILI and the timing and outcome of DILI. We identified consecutive patients who developed DILI whilst on treatment for active TB; patients with active TB without DILI were selected as controls. Comprehensive demographic and clinical data, management and outcome were recorded. There were 105 (6.9%) cases of ATT-associated DILI amongst 1529 patients diagnosed with active TB between April 2010 and May 2014. Risk factors for DILI were: low patient weight, HIV-1 co-infection, higher baseline ALP, and alcohol intake. Only 25.7% of patients had British or American Thoracic Society defined criteria for liver test (LT) monitoring. Half (53%) of the cases occurred within 2 weeks of starting ATT and 87.6% occurred within 8 weeks. Five (4.8%) of seven deaths were attributable to DILI. Only a quarter of patients who developed DILI had British or American Thoracic Society defined criteria for pre-emptive LT monitoring, suggesting that all patients on ATT should be considered for universal liver monitoring particularly during the first 8 weeks of treatment. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 234 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
Researcher | 20 | 9% |
Other | 13 | 6% |
Other | 35 | 15% |
Unknown | 89 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 34% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 6% |
Unknown | 93 | 40% |