↓ Skip to main content

Understanding treatment decision making in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Rheumatology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding treatment decision making in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative assessment
Published in
Pediatric Rheumatology, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1546-0096-11-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen A Lipstein, William B Brinkman, Jessica Sage, Carole M Lannon, Esi Morgan DeWitt

Abstract

The increase in therapeutic options for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has added complexity to treatment decisions. Shared decision making has the potential to help providers and families work together to choose the best possible option for each patient from the array of choices. As part of a needs assessment, prior to design and implementation of shared decision making interventions, we conducted a qualitative assessment of clinicians' current approaches to treatment decision making in JIA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Psychology 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,349,805
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#558
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,440
of 205,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.