You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rationale, design, and methodology for the optimizing outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their infants study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-13-184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diane C Berry, Madeline Neal, Emily G Hall, Todd A Schwartz, Sarah Verbiest, Karen Bonuck, William Goodnight, Seth Brody, Karen F Dorman, Mary K Menard, Alison M Stuebe |
| Abstract |
Women who are diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk for developing prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). To date, there have been few interdisciplinary interventions that target predominantly ethnic minority low-income women diagnosed with GDM. This paper describes the rationale, design and methodology of a 2-year, randomized, controlled study being conducted in North Carolina. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 537 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 535 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 93 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 6% |
| Researcher | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 87 | 16% |
| Unknown | 156 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 89 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 6% |
| Psychology | 29 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 77 | 14% |
| Unknown | 171 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,072,573
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,295
of 4,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,347
of 211,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#26
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.