↓ Skip to main content

Determining the role of sarcomeric proteins in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: a study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determining the role of sarcomeric proteins in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: a study protocol
Published in
BMC Neurology, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-13-144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia Lassche, Coen AC Ottenheijm, Nicol C Voermans, Henk-Jan Westeneng, Barbara H Janssen, Silvère M van der Maarel, Maria T Hopman, George W Padberg, Ger JM Stienen, Baziel GM van Engelen

Abstract

Although muscle weakness is a hallmark of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), the molecular mechanisms that lead to weakness in FSHD remain largely unknown. Recent studies suggest aberrant expression of genes involved in skeletal muscle development and sarcomere contractility, and activation of pathways involved in sarcomeric protein degradation. This study will investigate the contribution of sarcomeric protein dysfunction to the pathogenesis of muscle weakness in FSHD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Researcher 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 14 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,281,593
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,480
of 2,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,480
of 210,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#43
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.