↓ Skip to main content

The ZC3HC1 rs11556924 polymorphism is associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ZC3HC1 rs11556924 polymorphism is associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/ar4335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raquel López-Mejías, Fernanda Genre, Mercedes García-Bermúdez, Alfonso Corrales, Carlos González-Juanatey, Javier Llorca, José A Miranda-Filloy, Javier Rueda-Gotor, Ricardo Blanco, Santos Castañeda, Javier Martín, Miguel A González-Gay

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a complex polygenic disease associated with chronic inflammation, accelerated atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular (CV) mortality. A recent meta-analysis has described the ZC3HC1 rs11556924 polymorphism as one of the most important signals associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) in non-rheumatic Caucasian individuals. In this study we evaluated the potential association of this gene polymorphism with subclinical atherosclerosis assessed by the evaluation of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in RA patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Psychology 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,710
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,144
of 223,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#35
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.