You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Remote vibrotactile noise improves light touch sensation in stroke survivors’ fingertips via stochastic resonance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leah R Enders, Pilwon Hur, Michelle J Johnson, Na Jin Seo |
| Abstract |
Stroke rehabilitation does not often integrate both sensory and motor recovery. While subthreshold noise was shown to enhance sensory signal detection at the site of noise application, having a noise-generating device at the fingertip to enhance fingertip sensation and potentially enhance dexterity for stroke survivors is impractical, since the device would interfere with object manipulation. This study determined if remote application of subthreshold vibrotactile noise (away from the fingertips) improves fingertip tactile sensation with potential to enhance dexterity for stroke survivors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 40 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#237,687
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#7
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,725
of 223,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them