You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A school-based program implemented by community providers previously trained for the prevention of eating and weight-related problems in secondary-school adolescents: the MABIC study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-955 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Sánchez-Carracedo, Gemma López-Guimerà, Jordi Fauquet, Juan Ramón Barrada, Montserrat Pàmias, Joaquim Puntí, Mireia Querol, Esther Trepat |
| Abstract |
The prevention of eating disorders and disordered eating are increasingly recognized as public health priorities. Challenges in this field included moving from efficacy to effectiveness and developing an integrated approach to the prevention of a broad spectrum of eating and weight-related problems. A previous efficacy trial indicated that a universal disordered eating prevention program, based on the social cognitive model, media literacy educational approach and cognitive dissonance theory, reduced risk factors for disordered eating, but it is unclear whether this program has effects under more real-world conditions. The main aim of this effectiveness trial protocol is to test whether this program has effects when incorporating an integrated approach to prevention and when previously-trained community providers implement the intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 189 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2013.
All research outputs
#14,779,369
of 23,940,793 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,629
of 15,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,332
of 214,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#206
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,940,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.