↓ Skip to main content

Immunodetection of cells with a CD44+/CD24- phenotype in canine mammary neoplasms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunodetection of cells with a CD44+/CD24- phenotype in canine mammary neoplasms
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-9-205
Pubmed ID
Authors

GeórgiaModé Magalhães, ErikaMaria Terra, Rosemeri de Oliveira Vasconcelos, Márcio de Barros Bandarra, PamelaRodriguesReina Moreira, Mayara Caroline Rosolem, Antonio Carlos Alessi

Abstract

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are able to self-renew and to form metastases. Using flow cytometry, CSCs were detected in canine mammary tumors as cells CD44(+) and CD24(-). The aim of this study was to detect these CSCs by immunohistochemistry and correlate their frequency with canine mammary neoplasm grade and histopathological type.130 mammary neoplasm samples were selected from tissue blocks at the Department of Pathology at UNESP and classified according to (BJVP 4:153-180, 2011). These samples were composed by adenomas, lymph node metastases, solid carcinomas grades II and III, tubular, papillary and carcinomas in mixed tumor grades I, II and III. Immunohistochemistry was performed with antibodies against CD44 and CD24. Linear regression was performed using Pearson's correlation test.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 21%
Other 9 19%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 23 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,426,242
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#639
of 3,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,178
of 210,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.