↓ Skip to main content

Will bevacizumab biosimilars impact the value of systemic therapy in gynecologic cancers?

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Will bevacizumab biosimilars impact the value of systemic therapy in gynecologic cancers?
Published in
Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40661-017-0045-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bradley J. Monk, Warner K. Huh, Julie Ann Rosenberg, Ira Jacobs

Abstract

Bevacizumab is an important component in the treatment of various cancers, and despite guidelines recommending its use in both ovarian and cervical cancer, patient access to bevacizumab and other angiogenesis inhibitors is limited. Biosimilars are large, structurally complex molecules that are intended to be highly similar to, and treat the same condition(s) as, an existing licensed or approved (reference) biologic, with no clinically meaningful differences in purity, potency and safety. This article summarizes the role of bevacizumab in the treatment paradigm of ovarian and cervical cancer. We also discuss the potential role of biosimilars to bevacizumab, which may offer more affordable options in the future treatment of gynecologic cancers. Literature searches of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were conducted. Regulatory and individual pharmaceutical company web pages were also reviewed. Search terms included "biosimilar" and "bevacizumab," and these were used to identify information regarding biosimilar development, reporting results of biosimilar studies or biosimilars in development. At present, four bevacizumab biosimilar candidates are undergoing comparative clinical assessment, with the potential to increase access and offer efficiencies across healthcare systems. It is anticipated that biologics such as bevacizumab will continue to play a key role in the treatment of an array of gynecologic cancers. Biosimilars to bevacizumab are currently in development and have the potential to increase access to medicines in a variety of settings, including gynecologic cancers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Other 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice
#13
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,142
of 309,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecologic Oncology Research and Practice
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.