You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
T cell immunohistochemistry refines lung transplant acute rejection diagnosis and grading
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-1596-8-168 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lin Cheng, Haizhou Guo, Xinwei Qiao, Quan Liu, Jun Nie, Jinsong Li, Jianjun Wang, Ke Jiang |
Abstract |
Lung transplant volume has been increasing. However, inaccurate and uncertain diagnosis for lung transplant rejection hurdles long-term outcome due to, in part, interobserver variability in rejection grading. Therefore, a more reliable method to facilitate diagnosing and grading rejection is warranted. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 29% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 43% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,349,805
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#756
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,892
of 210,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.