You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord matrix, adipose tissue and bone marrow exhibit different capability to suppress peripheral blood B, natural killer and T cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/scrt336 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreia Ribeiro, Paula Laranjeira, Sandrine Mendes, Isabel Velada, Cristiana Leite, Pedro Andrade, Francisco Santos, Ana Henriques, Mário Grãos, Carla M P Cardoso, António Martinho, M Luísa Pais, Cláudia Lobato da Silva, Joaquim Cabral, Hélder Trindade, Artur Paiva |
| Abstract |
The ability to self-renew, be easily expanded in vitro and differentiate into different mesenchymal tissues, render mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) an attractive therapeutic method for degenerative diseases. The subsequent discovery of their immunosuppressive ability encouraged clinical trials in graft-versus-host disease and auto-immune diseases. Despite sharing several immunophenotypic characteristics and functional capabilities, the differences between MSCs arising from different tissues are still unclear and the published data are conflicting. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
| Researcher | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 42 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,396,173
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#618
of 2,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,484
of 210,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.