↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and molecular characterisation of Eimeriaspecies in Ethiopian village chickens

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and molecular characterisation of Eimeriaspecies in Ethiopian village chickens
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-9-208
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Luu, Judy Bettridge, Robert M Christley, Kasech Melese, Damer Blake, Tadelle Dessie, Paul Wigley, Takele T Desta, Olivier Hanotte, Pete Kaiser, Zelalem G Terfa, Marisol Collins, Stacey E Lynch

Abstract

Coccidiosis, caused by species of the apicomplexan parasite Eimeria, is a major disease of chickens. Eimeria species are present world-wide, and are ubiquitous under intensive farming methods. However, prevalence of Eimeria species is not uniform across production systems. In developing countries such as Ethiopia, a high proportion of chicken production occurs on rural smallholdings (i.e. 'village chicken production') where infectious diseases constrain productivity and surveillance is low. Coccidiosis is reported to be prevalent in these areas. However, a reliance on oocyst morphology to determine the infecting species may impede accurate diagnosis. Here, we used cross-sectional and longitudinal studies to investigate the prevalence of Eimeria oocyst shedding at two rural sites in the Ethiopian highlands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,090,185
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#303
of 3,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,354
of 210,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.