You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An overview of the epidemiology and emergence of influenza A infection in humans over time
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Public Health, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13690-017-0182-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chau Minh Bui, Abrar Ahmad Chughtai, Dillon Charles Adam, C. Raina MacIntyre |
| Abstract |
In recent years multiple novel influenza A strains have emerged in humans. We reviewed publically available data to summarise epidemiological characteristics of distinct avian influenza viruses known to cause human infection and describe changes over time. Most recently identified zoonotic strains have emerged in China (H7N9, H5N6, H10N8) - these strains have occurred mostly in association with visiting a live bird market. Most zoonotic AIVs and swine influenza variants typically cause mild infections in humans however severe illness and fatalities are associated with zoonotic H5N6, H10N8, H7N9 and H5N1 serotypes, and the H1N1 1918 Spanish Influenza. The changing landscape of avian influenza globally indicates a need to reassess the risk of a pandemic influenza outbreak of zoonotic origin. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#286,749
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#5
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,029
of 323,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.