You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of non-response bias due to sampling in public health studies: A comparison of voluntary versus mandatory recruitment in a Dutch national survey on adolescent health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-017-4189-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kei Long Cheung, Peter M. ten Klooster, Cees Smit, Hein de Vries, Marcel E. Pieterse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 12 | 38% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 384 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 384 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 12% |
| Researcher | 38 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 12% |
| Unknown | 134 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 9% |
| Psychology | 31 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 19% |
| Unknown | 157 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,244,668
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,412
of 17,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,315
of 326,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#22
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.