You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of reporting standards for metabolite annotation and identification in metabolomic studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Giga Science, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-217x-2-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reza M Salek, Christoph Steinbeck, Mark R Viant, Royston Goodacre, Warwick B Dunn |
| Abstract |
The application of reporting standards in metabolomics allow data from different laboratories to be shared, integrated and interpreted. Although minimum reporting standards related to metabolite identification were published in 2007, it is clear that significant efforts are required to ensure their continuous update and appropriate use by the metabolomics community. These include their use in metabolomics data submission (e.g., MetaboLights) and as a requirement for publication in peer-reviewed journals (e.g., Metabolomics). The Data Standards and Metabolite Identification Task Groups of the international Metabolomics Society are actively working to develop and promote these standards and educate the community on their use. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 314 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 26% |
| Researcher | 61 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 61 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 51 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 14% |
| Unknown | 70 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,835,521
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#344
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,697
of 223,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.