You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the transport, health and economic impacts of new urban cycling infrastructure in Sydney, Australia – protocol paper
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-963 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris Rissel, Stephen Greaves, Li Ming Wen, Anthony Capon, Melanie Crane, Chris Standen |
| Abstract |
There are repeated calls to build better cycling paths in Australian cities if the proportion of people cycling is to increase. Yet the full range of transport, health, environmental and economic impacts of new cycling infrastructure and the extent to which observed changes are sustained is not well understood. The City of Sydney is currently building a new bicycle network, which includes a new bicycle path separated from road traffic in the south Sydney area. This protocol paper describes a comprehensive method to evaluate this new cycling infrastructure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 34 | 19% |
| Engineering | 24 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 26% |
| Unknown | 41 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,646,468
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,591
of 17,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,633
of 225,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#183
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.