↓ Skip to main content

Influence of inverse dynamics methods on the calculation of inter-segmental moments in vertical jumping and weightlifting

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of inverse dynamics methods on the calculation of inter-segmental moments in vertical jumping and weightlifting
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-9-74
Pubmed ID
Abstract

A vast number of biomechanical studies have employed inverse dynamics methods to calculate inter-segmental moments during movement. Although all inverse dynamics methods are rooted in classical mechanics and thus theoretically the same, there exist a number of distinct computational methods. Recent research has demonstrated a key influence of the dynamics computation of the inverse dynamics method on the calculated moments, despite the theoretical equivalence of the methods. The purpose of this study was therefore to explore the influence of the choice of inverse dynamics on the calculation of inter-segmental moments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 27 34%
Sports and Recreations 24 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 18%