You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-level analyses of Mycobacterium bovis lineages reveal the role of SNPs and antisense transcription in differential gene expression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-710 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Golby, Javier Nunez, Adam Witney, Jason Hinds, Michael A Quail, Stephen Bentley, Simon Harris, Noel Smith, R Glyn Hewinson, Stephen V Gordon |
| Abstract |
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a disease with major implications for animal welfare and productivity, as well as having the potential for zoonotic transmission. In Great Britain (GB) alone, controlling bTB costs in the region of £ 100 million annually, with the current control scheme seemingly unable to stop the inexorable spread of infection. One aspect that may be driving the epidemic is evolution of the causative pathogen, Mycobacterium bovis. To understand the underlying genetic changes that may be responsible for this evolution, we performed a comprehensive genome-level analyses of 4 M. bovis strains that encompass the main molecular types of the pathogen circulating in GB. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,405,432
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#630
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,686
of 224,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#15
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.