You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Determinants of child and forced marriage in Morocco: stakeholder perspectives on health, policies and human rights
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-698x-13-43 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexia Sabbe, Halima Oulami, Wahiba Zekraoui, Halima Hikmat, Marleen Temmerman, Els Leye |
Abstract |
In Morocco, the social and legal framework surrounding sexual and reproductive health has transformed greatly in the past decade, especially with the introduction of the new Family Law or Moudawana. Yet, despite raising the minimum age of marriage for girls and stipulating equal rights in the family, child and forced marriage is widespread. The objective of this research study was to explore perspectives of a broad range of professionals on factors that contribute to the occurrence of child and forced marriage in Morocco. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Pakistan | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 227 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
Lecturer | 33 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
Researcher | 12 | 5% |
Other | 34 | 15% |
Unknown | 68 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 47 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 9% |
Psychology | 8 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 8% |
Unknown | 74 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,378,711
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,350
of 17,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,067
of 223,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#121
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.