↓ Skip to main content

Developing a medication communication framework across continuums of care using the Circle of Care Modeling approach

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing a medication communication framework across continuums of care using the Circle of Care Modeling approach
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-418
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole A Kitson, Morgan Price, Francis Y Lau, Grey Showler

Abstract

Medication errors are a common type of preventable errors in health care causing unnecessary patient harm, hospitalization, and even fatality. Improving communication between providers and between providers and patients is a key aspect of decreasing medication errors and improving patient safety. Medication management requires extensive collaboration and communication across roles and care settings, which can reduce (or contribute to) medication-related errors. Medication management involves key recurrent activities (determine need, prescribe, dispense, administer, and monitor/evaluate) with information communicated within and between each. Despite its importance, there is a lack of conceptual models that explore medication communication specifically across roles and settings. This research seeks to address that gap.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 19 24%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,351,676
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,446
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,189
of 211,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#112
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.