You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of differential expression genes associated with host selection and adaptation between two sibling insect species by transcriptional profile analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-582 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haichao Li, Hao Zhang, Ruobing Guan, Xuexia Miao |
| Abstract |
Cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) and oriental tobacco budworm (Helicoverpa assulta) are noctuid sibling species. Under artificial manipulation, they can mate and produce fertile offspring. As serious agricultural insect pests, cotton bollworms are euryphagous insects, but oriental tobacco budworms are oligophagous insects. To identify the differentially expressed genes that affect host recognition and host adaptation between the two species, we constructed digital gene expression tag profiles for four developmental stages of the two species. High-throughput sequencing results indicated that we have got more than 23 million 17nt clean tags from both species, respectively. The number of unique clean tags was nearly same in both species (approximately 357,000). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,207,295
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,254
of 10,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,509
of 200,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#118
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,628 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.