↓ Skip to main content

Spiritual and religious beliefs: do they matter in the medication adherence behaviour of hypertensive patients?

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spiritual and religious beliefs: do they matter in the medication adherence behaviour of hypertensive patients?
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1751-0759-7-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene Kretchy, Frances Owusu-Daaku, Samuel Danquah

Abstract

Medication non-adherence is often a predominant problem in the management of hypertension and other chronic conditions. In explaining health behaviours, social determinants like spirituality and religiosity are increasingly identified to impact health and treatment. Although a number of researchers have found spirituality and religiosity to be primary resources among persons dealing with chronic disability and illness, studies relating this specifically to medication adherence have been limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 225 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Researcher 19 8%
Lecturer 18 8%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 65 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 14%
Psychology 21 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 71 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#155
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,353
of 224,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.