You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the national roll-out of parenting programmes across England: the parenting early intervention programme (PEIP)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-972 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geoff Lindsay, Steve Strand |
| Abstract |
Evidence based parenting programmes can improve parenting skills and the behaviour of children exhibiting, or at risk of developing, antisocial behaviour. In order to develop a public policy for delivering these programmes it is necessary not only to demonstrate their efficacy through rigorous trials but also to determine that they can be rolled out on a large scale. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the UK government funded national implementation of its Parenting Early Intervention Programme, a national roll-out of parenting programmes for parents of children 8-13 years in all 152 local authorities (LAs) across England. Building upon our study of the Pathfinder (2006-08) implemented in 18 LAs. To the best of our knowledge this is the first comparative study of a national roll-out of parenting programmes and the first study of parents of children 8-13 years. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2015.
All research outputs
#4,473,180
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,916
of 14,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,088
of 211,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#107
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.