↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive function after cardiac arrest and temperature management; rationale and description of a sub-study in the Target Temperature Management trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive function after cardiac arrest and temperature management; rationale and description of a sub-study in the Target Temperature Management trial
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-13-85
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gisela Lilja, Niklas Nielsen, Hans Friberg, Janneke Horn, Jesper Kjaergaard, Tommaso Pellis, Malin Rundgren, Jørn Wetterslev, Matt P Wise, Fredrik Nilsson, Tobias Cronberg

Abstract

Mild to moderate cognitive impairment is common amongst long-term survivors of cardiac arrest. In the Target Temperature Management trial (TTM-trial) comatose survivors were randomized to 33°C or 36°C temperature control for 24 hours after cardiac arrest and the effects on survival and neurological outcome assessed. This protocol describes a sub-study of the TTM-trial investigating cognitive dysfunction and its consequences for patients' and relatives' daily life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 18%
Psychology 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 46 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,283,138
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#823
of 1,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,838
of 210,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.