↓ Skip to main content

The use of routine outcome measures in two child and adolescent mental health services: a completed audit cycle

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of routine outcome measures in two child and adolescent mental health services: a completed audit cycle
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte L Hall, Maria Moldavsky, Laurence Baldwin, Michael Marriott, Karen Newell, John Taylor, Kapil Sayal, Chris Hollis

Abstract

Routine outcome measurement (ROM) is important for assessing the clinical effectiveness of health services and for monitoring patient outcomes. Within Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in the UK the adoption of ROM in CAMHS has been supported by both national and local initiatives (such as government strategies, local commissioning policy, and research).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 21 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,434,249
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,452
of 4,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,848
of 211,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#59
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.