↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive analysis of the percentage of surface receptors and cytotoxic granules positive natural killer cells in patients with pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive analysis of the percentage of surface receptors and cytotoxic granules positive natural killer cells in patients with pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-11-262
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun-Peng Peng, Yi Zhu, Jing-Jing Zhang, Ze-Kuan Xu, Zhu-Yin Qian, Cun-Cai Dai, Kui-Rong Jiang, Jun-Li Wu, Wen-Tao Gao, Qiang Li, Qing Du, Yi Miao

Abstract

Digestive malignancies, especially pancreatic cancer (PC), gastric cancer (GC), and colorectal cancer (CRC), still occur at persistently high rates, and disease progression in these cancers has been associated with tumor immunosurveillance escape. Natural killer (NK) cell dysfunction may be responsible for this phenomenon, however, the exact relationship between tumor immunosurveillance escape in digestive malignancies and NK cell dysfunction remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Student > Master 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 11 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,617,218
of 15,472,856 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#384
of 2,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,893
of 186,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,472,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.