↓ Skip to main content

Effects and costs of home-based training with telemonitoring guidance in low to moderate risk patients entering cardiac rehabilitation: The FIT@Home study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects and costs of home-based training with telemonitoring guidance in low to moderate risk patients entering cardiac rehabilitation: The FIT@Home study
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-13-82
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jos J Kraal, Niels Peek, M Elske van den Akker-Van Marle, Hareld MC Kemps

Abstract

Physical training has beneficial effects on exercise capacity, quality of life and mortality in patients after a cardiac event or intervention and is therefore a core component of cardiac rehabilitation. However, cardiac rehabilitation uptake is low and effects tend to decrease after the initial rehabilitation period. Home-based training has the potential to increase cardiac rehabilitation uptake, and was shown to be safe and effective in improving short-term exercise capacity. Long-term effects on physical fitness and activity, however, are disappointing. Therefore, we propose a novel strategy using telemonitoring guidance based on objective training data acquired during exercise at home. In this way, we aim to improve self-management skills like self-efficacy and action planning for independent exercise and, consequently, improve long-term effectiveness with respect to physical fitness and physical activity. In addition, we aim to compare costs of this strategy with centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 297 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 15%
Student > Master 40 13%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 90 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 17%
Psychology 17 6%
Sports and Recreations 10 3%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 102 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,996,768
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#382
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,655
of 209,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.